THE EVOLUTION OF THE TURKEY MANAGERS
Recognise the Beast
Case
Study 1
Personified
by
|
Penguin
|
Recognised
by
|
Highly
sociable behaviour, showy style, paternalistic attitude
|
Needs
|
Social
approval, interaction,
|
Fears
|
Rejection,
losing face
|
Pace
of work
|
Slow
due to consultative approach
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Deliberate,
cautious, considers the human consequences
|
Preferred
work environment
|
Social,
friendly, informal
|
Measure
progress by
|
Position,
status, material possessions, lifestyle
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Dealing
with ‘like me’ people
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Making
hard decisions in soft times
|
Clashes
with
|
No
frills, pragmatic, task focused people
|
Irritated
by
|
Procedures,
accountability, details
|
Case
Study 2
Personified
by
|
Shark
|
Recognised
by
|
Slick
but ferocious under threat or being challenged, adaptable,
agile, unpredictable
|
Needs
|
Self
preservation and protection
|
Fears
|
Their
work or ego being challenged or undermined
|
Pace
of work
|
Swift
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Deliberate
based on self interest
|
Preferred
work environment
|
Total
autonomy with minimal interference
|
Measure
progress by
|
Change
and compliance
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Given
lattitude
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Consulting
and consider others
|
Clashes
with
|
People
who are stubborn, have differing views
|
Irritated
by
|
Procedures
and detail
|
Case
Study 3
Personified
by
|
Snake
|
Recognised
by
|
Well
groomed, smooth
talker, over promises under delivers, exceptionally well
organised, quick to lash out if threatened or in a position of
power
|
Needs
|
Status,
power, public
acknowledgement, respect
|
Fears
|
Being
undermined, challenges to his authority, position or image
|
Pace
of work
|
Slow
and methodical
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Self
serving, politically motivated rather than rationally based
|
Preferred
work environment
|
Well
organised and controlled
|
Measure
progress by
|
Results
and adulation
|
Most
comfortable when
|
In
complete control and in directing tasks |
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Humanising
the process and being sincere and consultative with others
|
Clashes
with
|
Those
who do not carry out his directives, or acknowledge his
position or formal authority
|
Irritated
by
|
Delays
in meeting results
|
Case
Study 4
Personified
by
|
Crocodile
|
Recognised
by
|
Guarded,
Quick to judge, react and attack, manipulative, two faced –
nice or nasty
|
Needs
|
Status
and image of success
|
Fears
|
Someone
with an upper hand, loss of face
|
Pace
of work
|
Constant
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Politically
based
|
Preferred
work environment
|
Exerts
high degree of control over others
|
Measure
progress by
|
Number
of conquests and published results
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Exerts
influence over others
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Being
more upfront and learning to disclose and trust others
|
Clashes
with
|
Methodical
and information seekers
|
Irritated
by
|
Display
of emotion, details
|
Case
Study 5
Personified
by
|
Hawk
|
Recognised
by
|
Intense,
aloof, self promoting, big picture thinker, controlling,
hugely egotistical
|
Needs
|
Status,
image conscious, achievements
|
Fears
|
Loss
of face and control
|
Pace
of work
|
Intense
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Manipulate
to fit personal needs
|
Preferred
work environment
|
100%
compliance from others, staying in control
|
Measure
progress by
|
Achievements
and favourable comments from peers held in high esteem
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Self
directed, challenging projects that bring limelight
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Listening
and consulting others, focusing on the needs of others
|
Clashes
with
|
People
who do not embrace change or vision
|
Irritated
by
|
Disloyalty,
slow people
|
Case
Study 6
Personified
by
|
Giraffe
|
Recognised
by
|
Amiable,
friendly, awkward, conservative, lacks self confidence
|
Needs
|
Social
approval, acknowledgement
for effort, respect from others
|
Fears
|
Appearing
incompetent and being liked
|
Pace
of work
|
Slow
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Consultative
and risk adverse
|
Preferred
work environment
|
Harmonious
|
Measure
progress by
|
Acceptance
of personal opinion, Agreement, progress rather than results
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Support
and encouragement, ideas from others
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Innovative,
challenging status quo, stepping out of comfort zone
|
Clashes
with
|
People
who are abrasive, manipulative and divisive
|
Irritated
by
|
Disloyalty,
loud and aggressive behaviour
|
Case
Study 7
Personified
by
|
Bull
|
Recognised
by
|
Forcefulness,
intensity of emotion, sense of justice, direct, insensitive
|
Needs
|
Results,
economic success, stay active, sense of importance, to be
heard and appreciated
|
Fears
|
Importance
being eroded, unable to influence outcome
|
Pace
of work
|
Fast
and adhoc
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Risk
taking and impulsive
|
Preferred
work environment
|
Varied
and challenging, intellectually stimulating
|
Measure
progress by
|
Result,
tangible growth
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Allowed
to lead and direct others
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Learning
to vary own pace and style to suit others
|
Clashes
with
|
Those
who are not receptive to his opinion or obstruct progress
|
Irritated
by
|
Slowness
in getting results, being
used by others, lack of enthusiasm
|
Case
Study 8
Personified
by
|
Weasel
|
Recognised
by
|
Active,
hardworking, disciplined, systematic, condescending, caustic
in his attack when threatened by others less powerful, rigid
in thinking
|
Needs
|
Structure,
logical approach, need to be correct and seen as the best
|
Fears
|
Being
challenged, being
criticised
|
Pace
of work
|
Methodical
and deliberate
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Detail
oriented, thorough
|
Preferred
work environment
|
Orderly
and controlled
|
Measure
progress by
|
Qualification
and public acknowledgement and results
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Structured,
detailed and controlled environment
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Being
more spontaneous and relaxed, to vary own pace and style to
suit others
|
Clashes
with
|
Those
who devalue his/her opinion or position, or highly emotive or
lack respect
|
Irritated
by
|
Vague
or unsubstantiated ideas or argument, impulsive behaviour,
|
Case
Study 9
Personified
by
|
Mantra-ray
eel
|
Recognised
by
|
Well
spoken, street smart, highly manipulative, unethical, self
serving, polished and slick
|
Needs
|
Boost
power, influence others for control, maintain image
|
Fears
|
Loss
of status, rejection, loss of power
|
Pace
of work
|
Full
steam ahead or completely stop
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Politically
driven and self serving
|
Preferred
work environment
|
In
complete control and can supervise
|
Measure
progress by
|
Position
and title in the hierarchy
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Can
manipulate others to get results
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Being
genuine, giving others more responsibility and authority,
sharing information
|
Clashes
with
|
Those
who challenge his position or opinion, exposes his scheme
|
Irritated
by
|
Disloyalty,
non compliance with his request, demands justification for his
behaviour
|
Case
Study 10
Personified
by
|
Rat
|
Recognised
by
|
Adaptability,
cunning, street smart, tough talking, self serving, secretive,
agile
|
Needs
|
Self
preservation, be acknowledged, exercise creativity, boost ego
|
Fears
|
Being
disadvantaged or loss of privilege or status, stagnation
|
Pace
of work
|
Fast
in executing task
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Intuitively
based but not thorough
|
Preferred
work environment
|
Complete
autonomy to innovate
|
Measure
progress by
|
Results
and financial rewards
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Implement
ideas with minimal obstruction
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
More
analysing and less impulsive talk and decision
|
Clashes
with
|
Those
who expose his/her inadequacies or make personal attacks
|
Irritated
by
|
Authority,
bureaucracy, policies, procedures
|
Case
Study 11
Personified
by
|
Silver
Fox
|
Recognised
by
|
Opportunistic,
innovative, global thinking, resourceful, manipulative, self
serving
|
Needs
|
Variety
and challenges
|
Fears
|
Stagnation,
disloyalty, conservatism
|
Pace
of work
|
Fast
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Gut
feel, quick, intuitive
|
Preferred
work environment
|
Autonomy
for self and
others
|
Measure
progress by
|
Change
and innovation
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Influencing
others
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Attention
to detail, evaluating consequences of
actions and decision
|
Clashes
with
|
Theoretical,
traditional and conservative people
|
Irritated
by
|
Rules,
regulations, bureaucracy
|
Case
Study 12
Personified
by
|
Black
Pather
|
Recognised
by
|
Swift
response, powerful, highly critical, instilling fear in
others, loner, loner, ruthless in
getting result, enigmatic
|
Needs
|
To
be perceived to be superior, consistently high results,
decisive
|
Fears
|
No
room for manoevering, locked in position
|
Pace
of work
|
Very
swift
|
Decision
making tendencies
|
Quick
decision based on gut feel
|
Preferred
work environment
|
Have
competent staff to look after the day-to-day operation, and
free up time for strategic issues
|
Measure
progress by
|
Results
and meeting challenges
|
Most
comfortable when
|
Others
act on his advice/decision
|
Can
improve effectiveness by
|
Humanise
the process and allow room for consultation and personal
growth for others
|
Clashes
with
|
Those
who do not carry out his directives, or opposes his views
|
Irritated
by
|
Anything
that stifles his style or progress
|
|